i.e., price of PT in the underlying unit vs. in the asset unit
Recommendation: Price PT against Underlying Assets rather than against the Asset.
Why: Many underlying assets (yield-bearing tokens) represent “assets staked in a specific protocol,” so the Asset price of that underlying is not strictly well-defined (redeemability, slashing risk, etc.). Therefore, a “perfect” PT→Asset price cannot be provided.
Example (PT-sUSDe / sUSDe, Asset = USDe): Napier can guarantee that 1 PT-sUSDe can be exchanged for X sUSDe, so a PT→Underlying Assets price exists natively.
By contrast, sUSDe→USDe redemption is not guaranteed; sUSDe’s “Asset” is actually USDe staked in Ethena, making the Asset-denominated price of the underlying not strictly well-defined.
Depeg behavior: Even if sUSDe depegs from USDe, the PT→sUSDe conversion remains correct, since it relies on the Underlying assets side, not on external redeemability.
Set a Discount Factor
Set the discount factor (rateBps) that determines the annualized linear slope until maturity.
rateBps represents the annual slope, where 1 bps = 0.01%. Therefore, 10,000 bps = 100% per year.